Publications
Publications by the League for Pastoralist Peoples and Endogenous
Livestock Development and its partner Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan,
and about their work.
You will need Adobe Reader to read
files marked .
Get it here.

|
 |
Exploring Orissa’s animal cultures with Dr. Balaram’s pathe pathshala
Ilse Koehler-Rollefson
League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development (2011)
The eastern Indian state of Orissa has a wealth of local livestock
breeds, LPP's Ilse Koehler-Rollefson has learned. She visited farmers
who raise Ghunsur cattle and goats, a group of nomadic pig herders, and duck
keepers near the coast.
She also took part in a "roadside university", or pathe pathshala,
run by Balaram Sahu, a veterinarian from Orissa, to discuss livestock health
and management with local people.
Download
 |

|
 |
Marketing products from local livestock breeds
An analysis of eight cases
Evelyn Mathias, Paul Mundy and Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Animal Genetic Resources 47: 59-72 (2010)
Local breeds and minor species are hardy and able to thrive in harsh
conditions. Their adaptive traits and unique characteristics (coloured wool
or hides, extra-fine fibre, meat or milk with special tastes) offer
opportunities for the marketing of speciality products and sustainable food
production in marginal areas.
This study discusses eight initiatives from Africa, Asia and Latin
America that help communities to produce and market various products for
niche markets: milk and dairy products from dromedaries; cashmere, wool and
handicrafts from goats, sheep and Bactrian camels; and meat, meat products
and handicrafts from goats and sheep.
The main strategies were to seek new markets for existing or entirely new
products (rather than trying to exploit existing markets). Most initiatives
had some form of branding or labelling, and two had protected their products
with geographical indications.
Such marketing initiatives can be started with limited capital inputs but
are skill and knowledge intensive. They require strong commitment to
overcome seasonal fluctuations in production, the lack of infrastructure and
services, and difficulties in institution building. But when well planned
and carefully managed, they can help conserve breeds as well as provide a
livelihood for people involved in the value chain, allowing actors earlier
in the value chain – livestock keepers and small-scale processors – to
capture a greater share of the value of the end product than they would by
trying to serve a mass market.
Download article from this website

Download article
from FAO
 |

|
 |
Livestock keepers’ rights
The state of discussion
I.U. Köhler-Rollefson, E. Mathias, H. Singh, P. Vivekanandan and J.
Wanyama
Animal Genetic Resources 47: 119-23 (2010)
Livestock keepers’ rights (LKR) is a concept developed by civil society
during the “Interlaken process” and is advocated for by a group of
non-government organizations, livestock keepers, pastoralist associations
and scientists who support community-based conservation of local breeds.
This study provides an overview of the rationale, history and content of LKR
and suggests that biocultural or community protocols are a means of invoking
the principles of LKR even in the absence of their legal enshrinement. It is
concluded that besides striving for legal codification of LKR its principles
should form the basis of pro-poor and ecological livestock development in
general.
Download article from this website

Download article
from FAO
 |

|
 |
2010 retrospective
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Summary of activities of the Local Livestock for Empowerment (LIFE)
Network, 2010
Download |

|
 |
Recognising ethnoveterinary medicine and community rights
An investment in our future
Evelyn Mathias
Presentation at the conference on "Ethnoveterinary medicine: Tradition,
science, cultural richness". Bologna, 29 October 2010. Società Italiana di
Veterinaria e Zootecnia Tropicale per la cooperazione internazionale
Veterinari Senza Frontiere Italia
Download presentation
1413 kb
Download summary
19 kb |

|
 |
Agrobiodiversity in drylands
Evelyn Mathias
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ),
2010
"When it rains and drylands bloom, one realises the remarkable diversity
of living organisms they harbour. Long overlooked, this diversity is crucial
to the food security of a large share of the world’s population."
This information brief describes the importance of dryland agricultural
biodiversity, outlines the threats facing it, and points to the key role
that local people play in conserving it.
Download
311 kb |

|
 |
Livestock Keepers’ Rights
A rights-based approach to invoking
justice for pastoralists and biodiversity conserving livestock keepers
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson and Evelyn Mathias
Policy Matters 17, pp 113-115. 2010
Adapted livestock breeds enable their keepers to take advantage of common
property resources. They are an important resource for maintaining food
security in remote areas and in the adaptation to climate change. To ensure
their long-term survival, the livestock keepers who have bred and nurtured
these breeds need a bundle of rights that enable them to continue keeping
these breeds and make a living from them. Players in livestock development
should support the struggle of the livestock keepers for recognition during
the negotiations at various international forums.
This article summarizes the three principles and five rights that make up
Livestock Keepers' Rights.
Download
1341 kb
Complete issue of magazine |

|
 |
Biocultural Community Protocols
A tool for pastoralists to secure customary rights to the commons?
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Common Voices, Issue 2, 2010. Foundation for Ecological Security
Download
4337 kb |

|
 |
Kuttapalayam Confirmation
A group of non-government organizations has called on governments and
international organizations to support the conservation of livestock breeds
in their original habitats - and by the livestock-keeping groups that
developed them. Members of the LIFE Network, a grouping of organizations focusing on local
livestock breeds, made the call at a conference at Kuttapalayam, in Tamil
Nadu, India, on 13-15 August 2010. The final statement from the conference calls on the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations to promote agro-ecosystems approaches to
the management of animal genetic resources and support indigenous and local
production systems. These goals are already incorporated in the Global Plan
of Action on Animal Genetic Resources.
The NGOs also demanded that livestock keepers be included in the debate
about the future of livestock production and to be recognized as guardians
of livestock biodiversity. The conference statement was signed by 21 NGOs from India, South Africa,
Kenya, Spain and Germany.
Download
123 kb |

|
 |
People-centred livestock development
A tool for sustainable development?
Ellen Geerlings
People-centred livestock development builds on livestock
keepers’ own initiatives and efforts, while helping them to use the best of
both local and outside knowledge and resources. This literature review
summarizes and analyses the experiences of 16 projects and organizations in
Africa, Latin America and Europe that use such approaches.
Geerlings, Ellen. 2010. People-centred livestock development: A tool
for sustainable development? League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous
Livestock Development. Ober-Ramstadt, Germany.
Download
704 kb |

|
 |
Biocultural Community Protocols for Livestock Keepers
League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock
Development, and Local Livestock for Empowerment Network. 2010. Lokhit
Pashu-Palak Sansthan (LPPS). Sadri, Rajasthan, India
Biocultural community protocols are a new approach with great potential
for empowering pastoralists and other traditional livestock-keeping
communities. They are both a process and a document in which communities
invoke their rights as guardians of biological diversity under Article 8j of
the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Claiming rights for
in-situ conservation, they also help promote Livestock Keepers’ Rights to
maintain their breeds and continue their traditional management practices.
Biocultural community protocols put on record traditional
knowledge and the biodiversity that communities steward, in a process that
the communities themselves drive. In developing a biocultural community
protocol, communities become informed about national and international laws
that protect their rights. This book provides an overview of the process as
well as its legal background and describes the first experiences with
implementing this approach by livestock keepers in Asia and Africa.
Download
825 kb |

|
 |
Endogenous Development Magazine features biocultural protocols
Issue 6 of the Endogenous Development Magazine contains two
articles on biocultural protocols relating to livestock.
A biocultural protocol is a document that records a community's
role in ecosystem management, and states its rights to benefit from the
ecosystem. Several groups of livestock keepers have created biocultural
protocols describing their animal breeds and their indigenous knowledge
about their breeds.
The articles in the magazine are:
 | How Bio-cultural Community Protocols can empower local
communities by Kabir Bavikatte and Harry Jonas of
Natural Justice, a South
African NGO specializing on social and environmental law |
 | Bio-cultural Community Protocols, starting point for endogenous
livestock development? by Ilse Köhler-Rollefson of the
League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development. |
Bio-cultural Community Protocols enforce Biodiversity Benefits: A
selection of cases and experiences. Endogenous Development Magazine
6, July 2010. COMPAS, Leusden, Netherlands
Download the magazine
3 MB. |

|
 |
Declaration on Livestock Keepers’ Rights
Lists three principles and five rights that make up Livestock Keepers'
Rights, and provides the legal instruments underpinning these rights in
international law.
The Declaration is open for signatures until the end of August 2010.
The Declaration will be distributed at the tenth meeting of the Conference
of the Parties (COP 10) of the Convention on Biological Diversity in
Nagoya, Japan, from 18 to 29 October 2010.
To sign, please contact: LPP's Evelyn Mathias,
evelyn@mamud.com or Sabine Poth,
sabine@pastoralpeoples.org.
Please indicate whether you would like to sign as an organization, an
individual, or both.
Download
70 kb |

|
 |
Supporting livelihoods and local livestock breeds
Guidelines for putting Livestock Keepers’ Rights into practice
Livestock Keeper's Rights are three principles and five rights
that ensure that livestock keepers can continue raising their animals. This
document gives practical guidelines on how development professionals,
private companies, researchers, governments and policymakers can turn the
rights into practice.
Download
232 kb. |

|
 |
Local Livestock for Empowerment: The LIFE Network
Imagine if all cows were black and white... if all the pigs were pink...
if every sheep, and every chicken, were white...
This booklet draws attention to the threat to local livestock breeds, and
describes what the Local Livestock for Empowerment (LIFE) Network is doing
to help pastoralists and small-scale livestock keepers to maintain them.
LIFE Network. 2010. Local Livestock for Empowerment Network,
Ober-Ramstadt, Germany.
Download
1.7 Mb |

|
 |
Internationale Tagung Tierhalterrechte und Biologische Vielfalt
Schloss Lichtenberg im Odenwald, 19. Mai 2010
International conference on Livestock Keepers' Rights and Biodiversity
Lichtenberg Castle, Odenwald, 19 May 2010
A report of a conference organized by the League for Pastoral Peoples and
Endogenous Livestock Development. Summarizes presentations and discussions
by livestock keepers and specialists from Germany, India, Pakistan, South
Africa, Spain and Tanzania. In German.
Download
1 Mb |

|
|

|
Marketing to promote local breeds and improve livelihoods
Many local livestock breeds and minor species are in decline and
may be lost because they cannot compete with high-yielding exotic breeds.
Conserving these breeds is important: many have unique traits, such as hardiness
and disease resistance, that are vital for future livestock production. One way
to help ensure their survival may be to sell products from these breeds to
high-value, specialist markets.
The Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources
acknowledges the importance of market access to the sustainable use of livestock
diversity and calls for development of markets for products derived from local
species and breeds, and for strengthening processes that add value to their
products.
This publication describes eight examples of marketing of
livestock products (wool, cashmere, milk, meat and hides) from local breeds of
Bactrian camels, dromedaries, goats and sheep in seven countries in Africa, Asia
and Latin America. It shows how they have kept local breeds in use, while
enabling the small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists who raise them to
improve their livelihoods.
LPP, LIFE Network, IUCN–WISP and FAO. 2010. Adding value to
livestock diversity – Marketing to promote local breeds and improve livelihoods.
FAO
Animal Production and Health Paper 168. Rome.
|

|
 |
Leveraging the potential of livestock for dryland development
Why a paradigm shift is needed
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Presentation at an
international conference on Nurturing Arid Zones for People and the
Environment at the Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India, 25
November 2009.
Download presentation |

|
 |
Smallholder farmers and pastoralists fulfil an invaluable yet undervalued
role in conserving biodiversity. They act as guardians of locally adapted
livestock breeds that can make use of even marginal environments under tough
climatic conditions and therefore are a crucial resource for food security and
possibly for adapting to climate change. But in addition, by sustaining
animals on natural vegetation and as part of local ecosystems, these
communities also make a significant contribution to the conservation of wild
biodiversity and of cultural landscapes.
The Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources acknowledges and
seeks to support this crucial contribution of smallholder farmers and
pastoralists to keeping our planet healthy and diverse. The United Nations
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues backs up this strategic approach and
calls for it to be strengthened, while the United Nations Convention on
Biological Diversity also commits its signatories to support in situ
conservation by local and indigenous communities.
This publication provides a glimpse into the often intricate knowledge
systems
that pastoralists and smallholder farmers have developed for the management of
their breeds in specific production systems. It also describes the multitude
of threats and challenges these often marginalized communities have to cope
with and suggests interventions that can sustain valuable
human-animal-environment relationships and combine conservation of breeds and
their ecosystems with poverty alleviation.
Prepared by Ilse Köhler-Rollefson (LPP)
with contributions from Evelyn
Mathias (LPP) and Irene Hoffmann (FAO)
Contents
 | Background |
 | Economic and ecological roles of smallholder farmers and pastoralists |
 | Creators and guardians of breeds |
 | Conservation |
 | Why livestock keepers give up their breeds |
 | Motivation and incentives to keep a breed |
 | Improving small-scale livestock keepers’ participation in the
implementation of the Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources |
 | References |
Citation: FAO. 2009. Livestock keepers – Guardians of biodiversity.
Animal Production and Health Paper
167. Rome.
|

|
 |
This article (i(in German) in the July 2009 issue of the nature magazine
Natur+Kosmos
describes the work of
LPP's Ilse Koehler-Rollefson and
Hanwant Singh Rathore, director of
LPP's partner organization in Rajasthan, Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan. |

|
 |
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, H. S. Rathore and E. Mathias. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 22 Nov 2008.
AbstractIn South Asia, and throughout the developing world, the predominant official approach to livestock development has been improvement of production by means of upgrading local breeds via cross-breeding with exotic animals. This strategy has led to the replacement and dilution of locally adapted breeds with non-native ones. This has resulted in an alarming loss that has been estimated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to amount to one breed every two weeks. Based on selected case studies this paper argues that development strategies using locally adapted breeds and species are much more likely to benefit livestock keepers whilst also maintaining domestic animal diversity and bearing a smaller ecological footprint. It also analyses the rationale for “Livestock Keepers’ Rights”, a principle that grew out of the struggle of traditional livestock keepers to retain control over their production resources, such as grazing areas and breeding stock, in the face of unfavourable policy environments.
Draft version (93 kb) Order published version
|

|
 |
Consultancy Report to the League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development
Susanne Gura
An analysis of the impact of capital-intensive livestock production and how
it affects resource-poor smallholders.
|

|

 |
Every month, one more livestock breed becomes extinct...
This 8-page booklet and accompanying poster, published by the League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development and the LIFE Network, highlight the issues and offer some solutions.
 |
Booklet
393 kb (in English)
|
 |
Poster
423 kb (in English and German)
|
|

|
 |
Strengthening local initiatives,
using resources sustainablyEndogenous livestock development means putting small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists at the centre of their own development. It means building on what they already do, and supporting their initiatives to improve their livelihoods, instead of imposing "solutions" from outside.
LPP and the Endogenous Livestock Development Network have published a 24-page booklet outlining the endogenous livestock development approach and introducing the ELD Network.
|

|
 |
The United Nations continues to see pastoralism as a main reason for desertification, says Drynet, a global initiative on drylands. But a large number of scientific studies contradict this, and instead show the positive effects of pastoralism as a land-use strategy.
LPP's Ilse Koehler-Rollefson and Silke Brehm have collated some of the bright aspects of pastoralism.
|

|
 |
"How to destroy biodiversity in protected areas?" asks this poster. "Easy! Just ban traditional grazing there." Banning pastoralists from traditional grazing areas alters the balance of wildlife, making scarce species such as leopards, lions and bustards even scarcer. This poster by LPP's Ilse Koehler-Rollefson and Hanwant Singh Rathore of Indian partner Lokhit Palu-Pashak Sansthan, outlines how pastoralists are fighting such bans. It was prepared for the Working Group on Protected Areas on 11-15 February 2008 in Rome.
|

|

 |
Ilse Koehler-Rollefson, Evelyn Mathias, Hanwant Singh Rathore, P.
Vivekanandan and Jacob Wanyama, 2008
pp 84-86 in: Mainstreaming biodiversity issues into forestry and
agriculture: Abstracts of poster presentations at the 13th meeting of
the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice
of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 18-22 Feb 2008, Rome.
CBD Technical Series 34. Secretariat of the Convention on
Biological Diversity.
"Pastoralists and small-scale livestock keepers are crucial to
conserving farm animal genetic resources", says this poster, presented
by LPP at the 13th meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific,
Technical and Technological Advice of the
Convention on Biological Diversity,
18-22 Feb 2008 in Rome.
The
accompanying abstract, published in the
CBD Technical Series 34, outlines the LIFE approach to
documenting indigenous breeds, lobbying and advocacy for Livestock
Keepers' Rights, and exploring value addition and marketing for
livestock products.
|

|
 |
League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous Livestock Development, 2007 Confused about patents and how they relate to the livestock breeds? What's the difference between a patent and a trademark? A geographical indication and a sui generis system? What are Livestock Keepers' Rights?
This two-page leaflet explains it all in simple language.
|

|
 |
Advocating livestock keepers' rightsat the International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources, Interlaken, Switzerland
1-7 September 2007. A report by the League for Pastoral Peoples and Endogenous
Livestock Development, 2007 The report details LPP's work in the build-up to and during the conference, analyses the outcomes and outlines plans for future work.
|

|
 |
The first draft report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture has been published by FAO. This report covers the state of agricultural biodiversity in the livestock sector, livestock sector trends, capacities in animal genetic resource management, the management of animal genetic resources, and needs and challenges. The report is expected to be adopted by the First International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources on 1-7 September 2007 in Interlaken, Switzerland. Section 1C, on flows of animal genetic resources, was prepared by LPP's Evelyn Mathias, Ilse Koehler-Rollefson and Paul Mundy.
 |
Section 1C only
1240 kb |
 |
Whole document
2.43 Mb (for first section, which gives access to other chapters as separate downloads) |
|

|

 |
The interdependence between pastoralists, breeds,
access to the commons, and livelihoods
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson and the LIFE Network, 2007
Focuses on a key threat to the survival of pastoralists and
their livestock breeds: the loss of access to grazing and water.
Download:
A documentary film to accompany the book, produced by award-winning
filmmaker Moving Images, is
also available.
Order from LPP. |

|
 |
An alternative vision of livestock development for the poor
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, 2007
|

|
 |
Concentration and proprietary strategies of an emerging power in the
global food economy
Susanne Gura, 2007
|

|
 |
Statement on Livestock Keepers' Rights issued by members of civil
society, government, inter-governmental organizations, researchers,
livestock keepers and the private sector from 17 countries in Bellagio,
Italy, April 2006.
|

|
 |
Still a viable option?
Workshop report compiled by
Chakrawarti Singh and Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan, 2005
|

|
 |
Safeguarding national assets for food security and trade
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
GTZ, FAO, CTA, 2004
Summary of four workshops on livestock genetic resources held in Mozambique,
Angola, Zambia and Swaziland.
|

|
 |
Conservation cannot ignore pastoral rights
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Published in
Down to Earth, 31 July 2005
Describes how a directive aimed at promoting conservation in India
is harming pastoralists in Rajasthan and the livestock biodiversity
they conserve.
|

|
 |
The exchange of livestock breeds and genes between North and South
Evelyn Mathias and Paul Mundy, 2005
An analysis of the flows of livestock breeds and genes between
Germany and the developing world.
|

|

|
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson and Hanwant Singh Rathore, 2005
Down To Earth, 31 May 2005
A journey through Rajasthan's Thar Desert to document the drastic
decline in camel numbers there.
|

|

|
Documenting animal breeds and
breeding from a community perspective
Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan and Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, 2005
Describes the threats to indigenous breeds of livestock, and how to
document them as a first step in conserving them in collaboration with
the communities where they evolved. Manual produced with support from
GTZ.
|

|
 |
Can it help the drylands and food-insecure countries?
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, 2005
Arguments for an international agreement
to govern the genetic resources of farm animals. How can breeds and
genes be conserved, where are the biodiversity hotspots, and what
should an international agreement cover?
|

|
 |
Building a Multi-Stakeholder
Platform for the Conservation of the Camel in Rajasthan
Proceedings of an International Conference held on 23–25 November
2004 in Sadri. Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan, Sadri, Rajasthan, India
Camel specialists from around the world discussed how to make camel
keeping more profitable and attractive, so the decline in camel
numbers in Rajasthan can be halted.
|

|
 |
The
perspective of camel breeders
Compiled by Arun Srivastava, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson,
Hanwant Singh Rathore, and Uttra Kothari. Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan
Over 50 camel breeders met in Sadri, Rajasthan in November 2004 to
discuss the declining numbers of camels in Rajasthan. They recommended
ways to increase access to grazing, improve veterinary services, and
promote the marketing of camel milk and other products.
|

|
 |
League for Pastoral Peoples, Intermediate Technology Development
Group East Africa, and Lokhit Pashu-Palak Sansthan, 2004
Leaflet calling that indigenous knowledge, pastoralists and other
traditional livestock keeping communities be recognized in policies
and databases on livestock.
|

|
 |
Ellen Geerlings
Seedling, October 2004. pp 11-16.
|

|
 |
Conserving breeds, supporting livelihoods
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
League for Pastoral Peoples, 2004
Booklet outlining the case for supporting the rights of livestock
keepers in order to conserve valuable animal genetic diversity.
|
 |
Also available in German as Tierhalterrechte: Nutztierrassen
erhalten, ländliche Existenzen bewahren
|
 |
and in Karamojong as Ngapedorosyo nguna a
ngikeyokok a ngibaren: Ekipitune ngibaren, ka akitogogong eyare
angitunga |

|
 |
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
La Revue Durable
12, pp. 28-31, Sept-Oct 2004.
Four-page article in French: "It is vital to protect traditional
livestock keepers."
|

|
 |
(Supporting independence and identity)
Eight-page colour brochure (in German) about LPP's work to
support pastoralists and promote livestock keepers' rights.
|

|
 |
Pastoralist/indigenous livestock keepers’ rights
One-page statement by leaders of traditional livestock and
pastoral communities, government representatives, civil society
organizations with a focus on livestock, genetic resources,
academics and livestock researchers, meet in Karen, Kenya on 27–30 October 2003.
|

|
 |
Indigenous livestock breeding communities and animal genetic
resources
Proceedings of a workshop of pastoralists and other communities
dependent on indigenous livestock breeds, focusing on animal genetic
resources and livestock breeders' rights.
|

|
 |
Keepers' rights, shared benefits and pro-poor policies
Documentation of a workshop with NGOs, herders, scientists, and
FAO. Organised by the League for Pastoral Peoples and German NGO
Forum on Environment and Development, in cooperation with CENESTA/CEESP
|

|
 |
Susanne Gura and LPP
Seedling, January
2003. pp 10-14.
|

|
 |
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 9(1),
March 2001, pp 12-15. Nuffic-CIRAN, The Hague.
|

|
 |
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Pages 391-399 in: Conservation and Sustainable Use of
Agricultural Biodiversity: A Sourcebook. Produced by CIP-UPWARD,
in partnership with GTZ, IDRC, IPGRI and SEARICE.
|

|
 |
Ilse Köhler-Rollefson
Managing Agrobiodiversity in Rural Areas, GTZ, Eschborn, 2000. 17
pp.
|

 |
Towards community-based approaches for animal
genetic resource conservation
Proceedings of a conference/workshop held on 1-4 November, 2000
in Udaipur & Sadri, Rajasthan, India.
176 pp. ISBN 3-00-010522-0
 | Available from LPPS (India) (price Rs 100). Contact lpps@sify.com |
|

|
 |
Promoting the sustainable use of farm
animal genetic resources
Issues and options
A 4-page summary of the issues surrounding our disappearing
livestock breeds.
|

|
 |
Promoting the sustainable use of farm
animal genetic resources
Information for action
A 70-page dossier with the details.
|

|
 |
Traditional and Modern Health Care for the Dromedary
|

|
 |
Ellen Geerlings, 2001
|

|
 |
Ilse
Köhler-Rollefson, 2000 pp. 55-63 in: Experiences in
Farmer’s Biodiversity Management: Report on the International
Workshop on Animal and Plant Genetic Resources in Agriculture at
the Biosphere Reserve Schorfheide-Chorin, Germany, 16-18 May 2000. German NGO Forum
on Environment & Development, Bonn.
|

|
 |
Hanwant Singh Rathore and Ilse Köhler-Rollefson,
2000 pp 47-54 in: Experiences in Farmer’s
Biodiversity Management: Report on the International Workshop on
Animal and Plant Genetic Resources in Agriculture at the Biosphere
Reserve Schorfheide-Chorin, Germany, 16-18 May 2000. German NGO Forum
on Environment & Development, Bonn.
|
|